The Limits
of Mass Protest in a Dictatorship
Public opinion cannot remove a communist
government by electing another one. But the PRC does aspire to a certain degree
of respectability in the world. Sending tanks to crush protests in Hong Kong
would make China look very bad – though this does not mean that the government
would not do so, if it saw no other way.
LONDON – Hong Kong is not Beijing. And July 1,
2019, is not June 4, 1989. First of all, in 1989, the violence in China came
almost entirely from the side of the government; the weeks of demonstrations in
Beijing and other cities had remained remarkably peaceful throughout. This was
mostly true in Hong Kong as well, until a small number of young protesters lost
their cool and ransacked the Legislative Council chamber with crowbars and
hammers.
The massive demonstrations in Hong Kong in
recent weeks were triggered by a proposed law authorizing extradition from the
city to mainland China. But that bill was suspended indefinitely after earlier
protests. Since then, the continuing demonstrations have been driven by fury
against the tightening constraints imposed by the Communist Party of China
(CPC).
The Tiananmen Square protests in 1989 began as
a petition to the CPC to curb official corruption and allow more civic freedoms
– freedoms that Hong Kong people already enjoyed, even under colonial rule. The
Chinese government promised that these freedoms would be preserved in Hong Kong
after the handover from Britain on July 1, 1997. That promise is now in doubt.
Despite these differences, there are important
similarities between 1989 and today. Like the Tiananmen demonstrations, the
mass protests in Hong Kong lack clear leadership. This is deliberate. Protests
movements are not political parties with their own hierarchies. Indeed, they
are usually opposed to the very idea of hierarchy. Partly as a consequence of
this, tactical splits among the protesters are difficult to control.
In June 1989, when it became clear that the
Chinese government was not going to respond to the protesters’ demands, and a
violent crackdown seemed increasingly likely, some activists counseled caution
and suggested that students go home and live to fight another day. Others
believed that they should do or die. If the authorities chose bloody violence,
so be it; that would only expose the murderous basis of an illegitimate regime.
The latter view prevailed, despite frantic
arguments from older dissidents, who had more experience with anti-government
protest, and had often suffered the harsh consequences. They sympathized with
the students, but were convinced that carrying on the mass protests to the
bitter end would provoke greater repression. They turned out to be right.
It is hard enough for street protests to have
any effect in a democracy. There were huge demonstrations in the US against the
Vietnam War in the 1960s, but it took years before the government finally
abandoned that brutal and pointless conflict. Occupy Wall Street in 2011, when
young and old protested against economic inequality in the US, was
heartwarming, but the gap between rich and poor is even wider now.
Public opinion, however, does matter in a
liberal democracy. It can take some time, but in the end a democratic
government must listen to its citizens, if only to get reelected. But what
might work against a democratic government would not even get off the ground in
a dictatorship.
For example, in Mahatma Gandhi’s day, India was
a colony, not a democracy, but the ultimate authority in the British Empire was
a democratically elected government in London, which had to take public opinion
into account. That is why Gandhi’s protests had some effect. But he was so
convinced that his non-violent methods were the only way to combat oppressive
authority that he urged Europeans to engage in similar peaceful resistance
against Hitler. This was not a practical suggestion.
Hong Kong was never a democracy. But, as a
crown colony until July 1997, it had some of the benefits of democratic rule,
such as a relatively free press and a robust independent judiciary. In some
ways, Hong Kong has not changed much since the handover, the anniversary of
which was celebrated by Hong Kong officials even as protesters where crashing through
the doors of the legislature. It is still a semi-autonomous colony, but this
time the imperial power is a dictatorship, which sets little store by press
freedom or independent judges, let alone public protests.
One of the most desperate gestures of the
people who occupied the legislative chamber in Hong Kong was raising the flag
of the old British crown colony. It was the greatest insult they could have
thrown in the face of the People’s Republic: better to be a colony controlled
by foreigners than to be ruled by a Chinese government that claims legitimacy
on the basis of nationalism and ethnic pride.
The main question for Hong Kong’s people is
whether methods that can be effective in a democracy can also work in a
dictatorship, even from a position of relative and fast-shrinking autonomy.
There are clearly limits to how far any Hong Kong government can be pushed to
accommodate public opinion. Men and women who are elected, on the narrowest of
franchises, to govern Hong Kong are already pre-selected by the Chinese
government. And the wishes of the imperial power cannot be thwarted any more
than they could under the British.
There is, however, one small chance that Hong
Kong citizens could make a difference. Public opinion cannot remove a communist
government by electing another one. But the PRC does aspire to a certain degree
of respectability in the world. Sending tanks to crush protests in Hong Kong
would make China look very bad – though this does not mean that the government
would not do so, if it saw no other way.
Demonstrations in Hong Kong have already forced
Chief Executive Carrie Lam to suspend an unpopular law. But protest can be
effective only if it remains peaceful. Most people in China, even those who are
not especially fond of the current regime, are terrified of violence and
disorder, of which the Chinese have seen too much in the last hundred years. If
mass protest in Hong Kong turns into chaos, there would be little sympathy in
China for the demonstrators, and the CPC authorities would find it much easier
to crack down with maximum force.
Writing for
PS since 2001
148 Commentaries
148 Commentaries
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario