The Approaching Debt Wave
The World Bank has warned that a massive debt
wave is building worldwide. There is no telling who will be hit the hardest,
but if vulnerable countries, from the United Kingdom to India, do not act soon,
they may face severe economic damage.
NEW YORK – Over the last decade, the world
economy has experienced a steady build-up of debt, now amounting to 230% of global GDP. The
last three waves of debt caused massive downturns in economies across the
world.
The first of these happened in the early 1980s.
After a decade of low borrowing costs, which enabled governments to expand
their balance sheets considerably, interest rates began to rise, making
debt-service increasingly unsustainable. Mexico fell first, informing the
United States government and the International Monetary Fund in 1982 that it
could no longer repay. This had a domino effect, with 16 Latin American countries
and 11 least-developed countries outside the region ultimately rescheduling
their debts.
In the 1990s, interest rates were again low,
and global debt surged once more. The crash came in 1997, when fast-growing but
financially vulnerable East Asian economies – including Indonesia, Malaysia,
South Korea, and Thailand – experienced sharp growth slowdowns and plummeting
exchange rates. The effects reverberated worldwide.
But it is not only emerging economies that are
vulnerable to such crashes, as America’s 2008 subprime mortgage crisis proved.
By the time people figured out what “subprime” meant, the US investment bank
Lehman Brothers had collapsed, triggering the most severe crisis and recession
since the Great Depression.
The World Bank has just warned us that a fourth debt
wave could
dwarf the first three. Emerging economies, which have amassed a record
debt-to-GDP ratio of 170%, are particularly vulnerable. As in the previous
cases, the debt wave has been facilitated by low interest rates. There is
reason for alarm once interest rates begin to rise and premia inevitably spike.
The mechanics of such crises are not well
understood. But a 1998 paper by Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin on
the mysterious origins of currency crises, and how they are transmitted to
other economies, shows that a financial tsunami can make landfall far from its
source.
How the source of financial trouble can vanish,
leaving others stranded, was illustrated in the delightful short story “Rnam
Krttva” by the celebrated twentieth-century Indian writer Shibram Chakraborty.
In the story – which I translated into English and included in my book An
Economist’s Miscellany – the desperate Shibram asks an old school friend, Harsha, to lend
him 500 rupees ($7) on a Wednesday, to be repaid the following Saturday. But
Shibram squanders the money, so on Saturday, he has little choice but to ask
another school friend, Gobar, for a loan of 500 rupees, to be repaid the next
Wednesday. He uses the money to repay Harsha. But when Wednesday rolls around,
he has no way of repaying Gobar. So, reminding Harsha of his excellent
repayment record, he borrows from him again.
This becomes a routine, with Shibram repeatedly
borrowing from one friend to repay the other. Then Shibram runs into both
Harsha and Gobar one day at a crosswalk. After a moment of anxiety, he has an
idea: every Wednesday, he suggests, Harsha should give Gobar 500 rupees, and
every Saturday, Gobar should give the same amount to Harsha. Shibram assures
his former school friends that this will save him a lot of time and change
nothing for them, and he vanishes into Kolkata’s milling crowds.
So who are the likely Harshas and Gobars in
today’s debt wave? According to the World Bank, they could be any country with
domestic vulnerabilities, a stretched fiscal balance sheet, and a heavily
indebted population.1
There are several countries that fit this
description and run the risk of being the conduit that carries the fourth debt
wave to the world economy. Among advanced economies, the United Kingdom is an
obvious candidate. In 2019, the UK narrowly avoided a recession, with a growth
rate a shade above zero – the weakest growth in a non-recession period since
1945. The country is also about to undertake Brexit. Conservatives in Britain
have promised that a “tidal wave” of
business investment will follow. This is unlikely: if there is a tidal wave, it
will probably be one of debt instead.
Among emerging economies, India is especially
vulnerable. In the 1980s, India’s economy was fairly sheltered, so the debt
wave back then had little impact. At the time of the East Asian crisis in 1997,
India had just begun to open up, and it experienced some slowdown in growth. By
the time of the debt wave in 2008, the country had become globally integrated
and was severely affected. But its economy was strong and growing at nearly 10%
annually, and it recovered within a year.
Today, India’s economy is facing one of its
deepest crises in the last 30 years, with growth slowing sharply, unemployment
at a 45-year high, close to zero export growth over the last six years,
and per capita consumption in the agricultural sector
decreasing over the last five years. Add to this a deeply polarized political
environment and it is little wonder that investor confidence is rapidly
declining.
It is not too late for countries to build
seawalls to protect against debt tsunamis. While India’s political problems
will take time to solve, the Union budget – to be presented on February 1 – is
an opportunity for preemptive action. The fiscal deficit needs to be controlled
in the medium term, but the government would be wise to adopt expansionary
fiscal policy now, with money channeled into shoring up infrastructure and
investment. Managed properly, this can boost demand without increasing
inflationary pressures, and strengthen the economy in order to withstand a debt
wave.
The country’s leaders must seize this
opportunity. The alternative is to adopt the brace position.
Writing for PS since 2002
52 Commentaries
52 Commentaries
Follow
Kaushik Basu, former Chief Economist of the
World Bank and former Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, is
Professor of Economics at Cornell University and Nonresident Senior Fellow at
the Brookings Institution.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario